One of the ironic verities
of life, it has been said, is that sorrow is sometimes a touchstone of love. (Libi
v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 70890, 18 September 1992)
If the two (persons) eventually fell in love, despite the
disparity in their ages and academic levels, this only lends substance to the
truism that the heart has reasons of its own which reason does not know. But,
definitely, yielding to this gentle and universal emotion is not to be so
casually equated with immorality. The deviation of the circumstances of their
marriage from the usual societal pattern cannot be considered as a defiance of
contemporary social mores.” (Chua-Qua
vs. Clave, G.R. No. L-49549, 30 August 1990)
We cannot castigate a man for seeking out the partner of his
dreams, for marriage is a sacred and perpetual bond which should be entered
into because of love, not for any other reason. (Patricia Figueroa vs. Simeon
Barranco, Jr., GR No. 97369, 31 July 1997)
The nuptial vows which solemnly intone the matrimonial promise of
love for better or for worse, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in
health, till death do us part,’ are sometimes easier said than done, for many a
marital union figuratively ends on the reefs of matrimonial shoals. (People of the Philippines vs.
Ruben Takbobo, GR No. 102984, 30 June 1993)
Marital union is a two-way process. An expressive interest in each
other’s feelings at a time it is needed by the other can go a long way in
deepening the marital relationship. Marriage is definitely not for children but
for two consenting adults who view the relationship with love amor
gignit amorem, respect, sacrifice and a continuing commitment to
compromise, conscious of its value as a sublime social institution. (Chi Ming Tsoi vs. Court of Appeals
and Gina Lao- Tsoi, GR No. 119190, 16 January 1997)
Love happens to everyone. It is dubbed to be boundless as it goes
beyond the expectations people tagged with it. In love, “age does matter.”
People love in order to be secure that one will share his/her life with another
and that he/she will not die alone. Individuals who are in love had the power to
let love grow or let love die – it is a choice one had to face when love is not
the love he/she expected. (Dr. Tayag as quoted in Padilla-Rumbaua
v. Rumbaua, G.R. No. 166738)
In rape, the ‘sweetheart’ defense must be proven by compelling
evidence: first, that the accused and the victim were lovers; and, second, that
she consented to the alleged sexual relations. The second is as important as
the first, because this Court has held often enough that love is not a license
for lust. (People vs. Olesco,
G.R. No. 174861, April 11, 2011)
Similar Post:
A DOSE OF LEGAL QUOTES
A DOSE OF LEGAL QUOTES
Hello. My name is Atty. Carlo Ybanez and I run a blog called Trial Trendy ( www.trialtrendy.com ). Will you allow me to repost this article on my website with a few tweaks. I will definitely acknowledge this site and give you due credit. I will even create a link that will generate some additional traffic to this site. Thank you.
ReplyDelete