A QUICK GUIDE TO ORAL ARGUMENTS; HISTORY AND
LEGAL BASIS
By: Jay B. Rempillo and Anna Katrina M. Martinez
Deriving its lineage
from a borrowed tradition, the practice of hearing cases on “Oral Argument”
before the Supreme Court is an important though largely unappreciated and
misunderstood process.
The practice of hearing
oral argument is taken from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
which hears arguments starting the first Monday in October—typically two
one-hour arguments a day—on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays in two-week
intervals until late April (with breaks in between).1 Rule 4 of the Rules of the Supreme
Court of the United States provides that “(u)nless it orders otherwise, the
Court sits to hear arguments from 10 a.m. until noon and from 1 p.m. until 3
p.m.” Oral argument is governed by Rule 28.2
Unlike the SCOTUS,
there is no clear-cut definition yet of “Oral Argument” in Philippine law
books. The Philippine Legal Encyclopedia defines “Oral” and “Argument”
separately: “Oral” as “by speech or word of mouth, as contrasted with writing,”
and “Argument” as “a reason advanced to prove a point or to persuade a person.”
The closest definition, however, is that found in Black’s Law Dictionary which
defines “Oral Argument” as “statements that are given orally by an attorney,
either in defense of a client or to rebut the opposing party’s statements.”
Retired Chief Justice
Artemio V. Panganiban, in one of his books aptly titled Battles in the
Supreme Court, wrote: “Oral arguments, which are rare, are usually held
only in cases involving difficult and complicated questions.” The former Chief
Justice said that the Court delineates the issues; and the lawyers for each side,
who are expected to come extensively prepared, dwell on these issues within the
allotted time. However, members of the Court may, and usually do,
ask questions on any topic, issue or matter. Hence, the allotted
time is usually extended. The lawyers are usually required to follow up and
close their cases with the filing of written memoranda after the oral
arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment